The Transhumanist Declaration states “humanity stands to be profoundly affected by science and technology in the future.” After reading books, novels, essays, and articles for my first-year seminar Cyberspace, I am certain that this statement is true, as technology will continue to become more prevalent in our lives. I am not opposed to all technology because I use my computer, cell phone, and iPod daily. However, I disapprove of artificial intellects, modified life forms, the elimination of aging, enhancing human intellectuality, and improving physical and psychological abilities. We are born as unique human beings with wonderfully different characteristics. Someone may not be athletic but they excel elsewhere, maybe in the classroom. Dwight Howard may be the perfect specimen of a human being, but even he frequently misses free throws. In our world, no one is perfect. I believe that this is one of the most important aspects of humanity.
In the future, the world may be filled with humans who are perfect. A world where every human being has the maximum intellectuality, physical, and psychological capacities. Why would anyone want to live in a world where every human is the same? The only reason that I would ever support this transhumanist ideal is so that the pursuit to end poverty in third world countries would be complete. Otherwise, I would never want to live in a world without cultural and intellectual diversity, as unique differences and perspectives make life interesting. I would be bored if I lived in a world where everyone was identical. In addition, I question why any person would want to be immortal. Aging is part of the life cycle and I think that it's unethical to alter physical and intellectual human traits.
Even though I am not a fan of transhumanism, I respect Humanity+. The non-profit is dedicated to the ethical use of technology to extend human capabilities. It supports the development of and access to new technologies that enable everyone to enjoy better minds, better bodies and better lives. In the Transhumanist Declaration, Humanity+ favors allowing individuals personal choice over how they enable their lives and firmly supports the reduction of risks in order to preserve life and health. I think that this non-profit deserves admiration for their commitment to the ethical use of technology to enhance the human condition. However, as these technologies develop, Humanity+ will not be performing human enhancements or be able to ensure every procedure is ethical and risk free. Will the scientists and the companies who create these new technologies act in their best interest or in the best interest of humanity?
Maddie,
ReplyDeleteI completely agree with everything you are saying in this post. Sometimes our imperfects or the traits which make us less than perfect are the traits which are the most interesting and make us unique from everyone else in our community. If we all excelled in everything we did tan how would we determine which jobs people would participate in and what we would do with our spare time. We all have something to offer to the world and while its not the same for each person that doesn't make it any less important. I would hate to wake up 30 years from now and see exact replicas of myself walking down the street, its a scary thought!
P.S Like the picture, Dwight Howard certainly is the perfect specimen of a human being!